|
Question
1. Why is extraordinary EzRobustaIP
Enterprise SoftwareIP
so extraordinary? |
The
theory behind EzRobustaIP
Enterprise SoftwareIP
is the new artificial intelligence invented by the Professor*. It mimics
normal, logical human thinking, not the warped thinking of software writers.
(*The
Professor, with a graduate degree in Computer Engineering from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, is the software engineering genius who invented and
developed the new technology basis of EzRobustaIP.)
![]() |
The philosophy underlying EzRobustaIP Enterprise SoftwareIP is this: Management needs accurate, up-to-the-minute management information, not questionable and/or outdated data. Yet, such poor quality data is what management must work with. There must be a way to resolve this contradiction. Now there is. The EzRobustaIP Enterprise Software is painstakingly designed to deliver up-to-the-minute management information, total accountability, total control, and total accuracy. Happy is the lot of the top management that, ahead of the competition, puts this capability to work. |
The execution of EzRobustaIP Enterprise SoftwareIP is based on the recognition of this fact: Top management is not expected to also be expert in information technology. And busy as top management already is, it should not have to spend the time learning a warped-thinking enterprise software system. Therefore a huge amount of intellectual capital was invested in the design and execution of EzRobustaIP to guarantee that no learning of the software is necessary. Thats why there is no User Manual, because none is needed. And for the same reason, there is no Training Department either!
|
In addition, the system is complete and fully inverted, so it enables users to execute at the detail transaction level, as permitted by upper management. Similarly, upper management has no limitation as to the enterprises bottom-line information. As a result, no employee is compelled to work under the pressure of having to meet a demand for information or analysis that he or she does not know how to instantly supply. Question
2. The approach you describe appears to be a winner. Why is it not widely
used? |
![]() |
Question
4. Excuse me, but the Professor should have published his or her work in academic
journals. A professor has an obligation to do research and publish, particularly
for peer review. Has that been done?
Answer: Peer review means free
peer copying, and free use by the for-profit software industry! With
all due respect to your point of view, no, and, as a matter of policy, the Professor
will not publish for peer review. He has, however, already published
in EzRobustaIP,
which has been tested and proved under the klieg lights of the incorruptible
marketplace. When academic research is supported by institutional funds, or
by public funds, that research must be published in the appropriate journals,
and thats proper. The Professors research was supported by private
resources, so there is no obligation to publish in any journals.
Question
5. Why is EzRobustaIP
not reviewed by the industry
press?
Answer: It will be when the
industry press chooses to do so. We, as a business organization, cannot control
what the press chooses focus on. Incidentally, many people still think that
no once can do what we claim. Let us remember, however, that only a several
short years ago, the experts in Detroit were certain the Japanese could not
make a viable automobile.
Question
6. Are there user references?
Answer: Absolutely. We provide
references to qualified personnel. Please bear in mind that no serious management
personnel, who are busy managing their enterprises, will spend their day taking
calls from curious but unqualified persons.
Question
7. What is EzRobustaIP
Enterprise Softwares operating platform?
Answer: Wintel machines, microcomputers,
minicomputers, any server with NT, SQL Servers or Novell, DB2, or any other
network operating system that follows the relational database model.
Question
8. What is EzRobustaIPs
development platform?
Answer: We choose not to answer.
To satisfy a curiosity is not a good enough reason to change our policy.
Question
9. Does EzRobustaIP
require the use of more personnel or less personnel?
Answer: Definitely less personnel,
of a lower caliber. The retraining and reassignment of personnel may be necessary.
Question
10. The other major systems are sold by big Accounting Firms and their consulting
arms. Will that be the situation with EzRobustaIP?
Answer: Every organization
is encouraged to become an authorized
EzRobustaIP
distributor. Our policy is one of an Open Door, and our distributors are handsomely
compensated. (For more details, please
see Distributorships Still Available.)
Question
11. Who is the Professor?
Answer: As we say in Latin,
Res ipsa loquitor: the matter speaks for itself. The Professors
work speaks volumes about who the professor is. The Professor holds a graduate
degree in Computer Engineering from MIT. We provide no further identifying details
as they have nothing to do with business; they are therefore a privacy issue
with us, and shall so remain. Curiosity is not enough of a legitimate reason
for us to breach the Professors privacy or security. We hope you understand.
Question
12. How does the price of EzRobustaIP
Enterprise SoftwareIP
compare with other major systems, such as SAP, BAAN, and Oracle?
Answer: We have no interest
in a price war, so we are all in the same zone, price-wise. The only difference
is that we actually deliver what buyers are hoping for. We are
simply a better management tool, no doubt
about it.
Question 13. There are great accounting and accountability debacles in governments throughout the world. Obviously the existing old technology systems are not doing the whats required, though some have now come up with piggyback patches. How is it that EzRobustaIP, with the extraordinary new technology capability you claim, is not out there solving those problems?
![]() |
Answer: Interesting question. Germane to the point is the report on Page A17 of The New York Times, dated Monday, October 14, 2002 AD (9-02 MSD). Under the heading of Auditors Say U.S. Agencies Lose Track of Billions, Mr. Joel Brinkley reports that the White Houses budget office rates nearly all federal agencies as having serious problems with their financial systems. He further reports, as an example, that the US Defense Department, with a budget of $333.0 billion, entered in its accounting for the fiscal year that ended September 30, 2000 AD (9-00 MSD), unsubstantiated balance adjustments totaling $1.1 trillion, almost 4 times the size of the budget itself but an improvement over the previous year, when the adjustments totaled $2.3 trillion. (A balance adjustment is any number pulled from thin air simply to balance the books.) |
Even the United States Internal Revenue Service, the New York Times report states, is unable to produce a hard figure for the amount of tax payments due the government. Instead it runs a statistical sample of taxes due and from that derives an estimate - an arduous process that takes several months. That estimate is one of the figures the government uses to plan spending for the year. Obviously slow, expensive, and inaccurate.
The interesting point is that if the government implemented EzRobustaIP Enterprise SoftwareIP, all that confusion will immediately disappear, as does a morning mist before the rising sun. You should talk to your Congressperson.
In all fairness though, the US government is not alone in this morass of failed government accountability. But perhaps, it is the only government honest enough to announce its monstrous failures. Taking appropriate steps to solve those failures is another matter.